InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,303.27
(
0.12%
)
US TECH 100
18,062.00
(
-0.10%
)
Dow Jones
40,003.59
(
0.34%
)
Brent Oil
83.76
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
66,865.62
(
-0.32%
)
Post# of 358430
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

zeninvestor32

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 260
Posts 1065
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/04/2004

zeninvestor32

Re: None

Thursday, 06/17/2004 5:33:24 PM

Thursday, June 17, 2004 5:33:24 PM

Post# of 358430
PROOF. CASE DISMISSED.

With all the messages I was getting today questioning my posts, I figured I'd turn off my ignores and see what the big brouhaha is. Well, as it stands the first message I encountered was Ms. Shell's post below:

http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=3363995

Now I am going to disassemble this post and show for once and for all how a basher operates. How they will twist and distort to make you question and distrust anything and everything. Then we can dismiss this basher (and her crony fung_derf) and everyone can be comfortable having them on ignore as I am about to demonstrate how THEY CAN NOT BE TRUSTED UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE. Amazing that Ms. Shell's claims to investigate these things so thoroughly when it took me all of 5 minutes to locate the information I needed to expose her fraudulent assertions.

Ms. Shell proudly boasts that she has completely negated my point that pink sheets don't hire top-tier lawyers. How so? She found two companies on the pink sheets that had Roger Glenn as counsel.

Let's dissect:

planet411 is the first company. Ms. Shell terms this a pink sheet. Yet she failed to note that the document cited was from 1999. Where was planet411 at that time? Oh what's this? A press release from Netscape and planet411 back in 1999? What's that it says? Planet411 trades on the NASDAQ NATIONAL MARKET SYSTEM? Hmmmm. I guess Ms. Shell failed to notice that, being the sharp researcher she is. And I guess she is implying that a partner that took in a dot.com company listed on nasdaq back in the dot.com explosion days (1999-2000) should be avoided? Never mind that probably ever major securities partner during those two years in San Francisco and New York likely represented a dot.com on the nasdaq. That was kind of the future back then. But I digress. The bottom line is that Ms. Shell failed to research this company. She failed to note that Roger was counsel during a time when it was a nasdaq listed company. She fails to mention any of this because that's not her aim. Her aim is to confuse and distort. To make others believe she has found the holy grail to refute me. Well I think I just dropkicked her first point.

Link: http://wp.netscape.com/newsref/pr/newsrelease742.html

Brek Energy: Ms. Shell would ALSO have you believe that the second company she cited in her link is a pink sheet company. Oh it is. But back when Roger was counsel, if you'll read the document she cited, IT WAS A PROSPECTUS FOR AN OFFERING FOR BREK, A COMPANY LISTED ON THE NASDAQ NATIONAL MARKET SYSTEM. Need further proof? Here ya go:

http://wp.netscape.com/newsref/pr/newsrelease742.html

Notice that little paragraph about how it's listed on Nasdaq? Notice the date? Notice that date aligns with the exact document Janice cited. Notice how at this time, this was a nasdaq company and NOT the pink sheet she claims Roger represented. Wow, that's 0 for 2 for Ms. Shell. Not a terribly good researcher and a much worse investigator.

Did Ms. Shell provide any evidence about WHEN Roger began or ended his representation for these companies?

Did Ms. Shell provided any other companies since the only two she listed were Nasdaq companies? Is she trying to say that Roger's representation of Nasdaq companies is an issue? Maybe she thinks we shouldn't go to the Nasdaq?


Fellow CMKXers, this is a case closed slam dunk tightly sealed presentation of exactly WHY I have had her on ignore for 2 weeks. All this time and THIS is the best evidence she could come up with to refute me? The only reason I did this is to show exactly WHAT the bashers do and why it is so WASTEFUL to even bother with them.

Wow I'm impressed Ms. Shell. You proved that Roger was counsel to a Nasdaq-listed internet company during the dot.com craze when the internet companies were the most successful of all nasdaq companies. You proved that Roger handled a prospectus for an offering of an oil and gas company when it too was listed on Nasdaq. Congratulations, you proved that Roger represents companies that are listed on Nasdaq. Now watch, she will rebut with "and where are they now?" AGAIN ignoring the fact that 90% of all the internet companies back in '99 busted. As for Brek, it's oil & gas. I don't know it's history but BACK THEN it was a Nasdaq stock and frankly I don't care to take any more time to research it's history (I'm sure Janice will but she ain't much of a researcher now is she?)

Anyway, case closed. Proof positive above that Janice and her cronies are not here to help. They are here to confuse and distort and manipulate. If you enjoy being confused, distorted, and manipulated based on shoddy research and bogus information, please continue to listen to her.

I won't even go into her or Fung Derf's other juvenile attacks on me. It's just not worth any MORE of my time. Good day. They are back on ignore. If in the future anyone references me an email that has anything to do with what Janice or other bsahers assert, I will refuse to answer because, as you can see, it's NOT WORTH THE TIME.

Thank you. Good night.





Z

As always, these are my personal opinions.

Hopefully nobody in here is investing anything but "fun" money that they can afford to gamble with.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up